Stuart, you didn't listen to the end. Therefore, you think you knew the conclusion of the talk before he concluded.
Michael, so how would Haidt define "truth"? As GB Shaw once said, "You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to your facts!" So who is the final arbiter of "the facts"?
Stuart, you didn't listen to the end. Therefore, you think you knew the conclusion of the talk before he concluded.
Michael, so how would Haidt define "truth"? As GB Shaw once said, "You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to your facts!" So who is the final arbiter of "the facts"?
Read his book, "The Righteous Mind".
I listened to 8 minutes , the fellow is clearly biased and uses humor in a manipulative way . Btw , a true liberal would not stereotype like he does .
My main point I would like to share is what was a liberal/conservative 11 years ago is no longer accurate.
You must watch until the end. You've drawn the exact opposite conclusion. Haidt is more relevant today than back then.